Just as Meryl Streep's characater - SOPHIE - said in that great film, "SOPHIE'S CHOICE"..."OMG!!! MUST I be forced to CHOOSE?!?!?"
Definitely one demolishes two. What match is the second pic from?
It's from Japan, but as we can't see their faces, I'm not sure who the wrestlers are,
It all depends on the hotness of the guy/guys getting worked over.
Oh man, I seem to be in the minority here. 2 on 1 beatdown is one of my favorite scenes in all of pro wrestling. It's so unfair -- the two bullies taking advantage, the lone fighter totally outmatched and overwhelmed... Cruel injustice just works for me.
I love seeing one guy getting beaten to a pulp by 2 other guys. The Shield have injected some real interest into WWE. In the old days how good was it seeing The Sheik and Abdullah the Butcher tearing someone to shreds - foreign objects, fire, chairs etc. Today the desire for PG status removes so much of the fun stuff.
Given the two choices, I go with a two-on-one beatdown. I can't even begin to say why.
ALRIGHT. I've hemmed and hawed, Yinned and Yanged over the two options; "TWO-ON-ONE" would be MY vote! It DOUBLES the opportunity for STRETCHING, BENDING, and SADISTICALLY PUNISHING the poor VICTIM'S more DELICIOUSLY EXPOSED and VULNERABLE, muscular body...which, in turn, DOUBLES the vicarious HORNY pleasure for ALL OF US! ("THREE-ON-ONE would even TRIPLE our fun! "THREE'S THE CHARM," after all!)
2 or more beating down on a hot sexy helpless wrestler stud!
By the way, where did the first pic came from?
Sorry Eric, but I don't recall what site I found them. I'm not even sure if it was taken in Mexico or some other country.
It sure looks really hot!